Menu Close

Issue 4(9), pp. 39-47, 2025

Review

Acoustic methods for quench detection in HTS cables

D. A. Aleksandrov

NRNU MEPhI, Kashirskoye Highway, 31, 115409, Moscow, Russia

e-mail: dimax.2001@mail.ru

I. V. Martirosian

NRNU MEPhI, Kashirskoye Highway, 31, 115409, Moscow, Russia

S. V. Pokrovskii

NRNU MEPhI, Kashirskoye Highway, 31, 115409, Moscow, Russia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62539/2949-5644-2025-9-4-39-47

Absrtract

This review summarizes modern approaches to quench detection in high-temperature superconducting (HTS) cables and magnets. The peculiarities of quench development in HTS conductors are discussed, including the low normal zone propagation velocity, the complex multilayer cable architecture, and current redistribution among individual tapes. These factors significantly complicate early detection of the transition from the superconducting to the normal state using conventional voltage- and temperature-based methods. Alternative quench detection approaches, including fiberoptic, magnetic, and capacitive techniques, are listed. The main focus is placed on acoustic quench detection methods, which have recently demonstrated significant potential due to their non-invasive nature, immunity to electromagnetic interference, and ability to detect early stages of localized heating associated with thermomechanical processes in the conductor. The principles of passive acoustic emission and active acoustic thermometry, including techniques based on multiply scattered elastic waves (coda waves), are analyzed in detail, along with experimental results obtained on individual HTS tapes and cables. Achieved temperature sensitivity and spatial resolution are discussed, as well as the prospects for implementing acoustic methods in operational HTS magnet systems.

Keywords: HTS; quench; CORC®; ROEBEL; NZP; VIPER.

References

[1] Z.Y. Li, Z.C. Pan, Q.J. Zhang, K.P. Zhu, C. Zhang, Z.W. Zhang, G. Dong, Y.M. Ye, Z. Yang, Superconductivity 12, 100137 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.supcon.2024.100137
[2] M. Windridge, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 377, 20170438 (2019). DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0438
[3] L. Rossi, C. Senatore, Instruments 5, 8 (2021). DOI: 10.3390/instruments5010008
[4] H. Piekarz, S. Hays, J. Blowers, B. Claypool, V. Shiltsev, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 943, 162490 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2019.162490
[5] D. Park, J. Bascuñán , Y. Li , W. Lee , Y. Choi, Y. Iwasa, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 31, 4300206 (2021). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2021.3064006
[6] Y. Yanagisawa, M. Hamada, K. Hashi, H. Maeda, Superconductor Science and Technology 35, 044006 (2022). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ac5644
[7]  Y. Öztürk, B. Shen, R. Williams, J. Gawith, J. Yang, J. Ma, A. Carpenter, T. Coombs, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 31, 4400405 (2021). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2021.3068305
[8] H. Park, G. Kim, K. Choi, J. Park, J. Kim, S. Choi, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 34, 4402705 (2024). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2024.3365084
[9] J. Zheng, J. Zheng, Y. Cheng, M. Li, H. Khodzhibagiyan, Sh. Dai, M. Novikov, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 34, 4606405 (2024). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2024.3446286
[10] A.H.K. Asadi, et al. Optimal Design of High Density HTS-SMES Step-Shaped Cross- Sectional Solenoid to mechanical stress reduction // International Conference on Protection and Automation of Power Systems (IPAPS), vol. 16, pp. 1-6, 2022.
[11] T. Mato and S. Noguchi, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 32, 3700105 (2022). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2021.3135796
[12] J.v. Nugteren, J. Murtomäki, J. Ruuskanen, G. Kirby, P. Hagen, G.d. Rijk, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 29, 4700108 (2019). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2018.2848229
[13] M. Marchevsky, Instruments 5, 27 (2021). DOI: 10.3390/instruments5030027
[14] H. Maeda, Y. Yanagisawa, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 24, 4602412 (2014). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2013.2287707
[15] H. Lu , Y. Hu, Y. Xiao, X. Li, L. Zheng, Q. Yan, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 33, 9000907 (2023). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2023.3317182
[16] J.R. Hull, M. Wilson, L. Bottura, L. Rossi, Applied Superconductivity : Handbook on Devices and Applications // Superconducting Magnets, 2015.
[17] H. Song, M.W. Davidson, J. Schwartz, Superconductor Science and Technology 22, 062001 (2009). DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/22/6/062001
[18] F. Trillaud, G. dos Santos, G. Gonçalves Sotelo, Materials 14, 1892 (2021). DOI: 10.3390/ma14081892
[19] T. Lécrevisse, X. Chaud, P. Fazilleau, C. Genot, J.-B. Song, Superconductor Science and Technology 35, 074004 (2022). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ac49a5
[20] B. Caiffi, L. Alfonso, A. Bersani, L. Bottura, S. Farinon, A. Gagno, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 35, 4002007 (2025). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2025.3529424
[21] E.E. Salazar, R. A. Badcock, M. Bajko, B. Castaldo, M. Davies, J. Estrada, V. Fry, J.T. Gonzales, Ph.C Michael, M. Segal, Superconductor Science and Technology 34, 035027 (2021). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/abdba8
[22] J. Jiang, J. Jiang, Y. Zhao, Z. Hong, J. Zhang, Z. Li, D. Hu, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 28, 4702105 (2018). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2018.2802487
[23] F. Scurti, S. Ishmael, G. Flanagan, J. Schwartz, Superconductor Science and Technology 29, 03LT01 (2016). DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/29/3/03LT01
[24] R. Teyber, M. Marchevsky, S. Prestemon, J. Weiss, D. van der Laan, Superconductor Science and Technology 33, 095009 (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ab9ef3
[25] M. Marchevsky, E. Hershkovitz, X. Wang, S.A. Gourlay, S. Prestemon, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 28, 4703105 (2018). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2018.2817218
[26] E. Ravaioli, D. Davis, M. Marchevsky, G.L. Sabbi, T. Shen, A. Verweij, K. Zhang, Physica Scripta 95, 015002 (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/ab4570
[27] M. Marchevsky, S.A. Gourlay, Applied Physics Letters 110, 012601 (2017). DOI: 10.1063/1.4973466
[28] O.O. Ige, A.D. McInturff, Y. Iwasa, Cryogenics 26, 131 (1986). DOI: 10.1016/0011-2275(86)90212-2
[29] O. Tsukamoto, M.W. Sinclair, M.F. Steinhoff, Y. Iwasa, Applied Physics Letters 38, 718 (1981). DOI: 10.1063/1.92491
[30] M. Marchevsky, G. Sabbi, H. Bajas, S. Gourlay, Cryogenics 69, 50 (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.03.005
[31] O. Tsukamoto, J.F. Maguire, E.S. Bobrov, Y. Iwasa, Applied Physics Letters 39, 172 (1981). DOI: 10.1063/1.92652
[32] M. Marchevsky, S. Prestemon, O. Lobkis, R. Roth, D.C. van der Laan, J.D. Weiss, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 32, 4701705 (2022). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2022.3164035
[33] G.S. Lee, M. Marchevsky, S. Prestemon, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 33, 9000505 (2023). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2023.3245560
[34] J. Krautkrämer, H. Krautkrämer, Ultrasonic testing of materials. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-02296-2
[35] H.M. Ledbetter, Cryogenics 22, 653 (1982). DOI: 10.1016/0011-2275(82)90072-8
[36] M. Marchevsky, Y.Y. Xie, V. Selvamanickam, Superconductor Science and Technology 23, 034016 (2010). DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/23/3/034016
[37] G.S. Lee, M. Marchevsky, C. Sanabria, S. Prestemon, IEEE Sensors Journal 22, 21846 (2022). DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3209143
[38] P. Moore, B. Isaacson, J. D’Alessandro, F. Alquaddoomi, Z. Zhao, O. Doolittle, et al., IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 33, 4702206 (2023). DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2023.3251941